# Brown v. State

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · September 17, 1993 · 623 So. 2d 867

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7631323

## Case

- **Full name:** Anthony BROWN v. STATE of Florida
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** September 17, 1993
- **Citations:** 623 So. 2d 867; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9432; 1993 WL 355193
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Diamantis
- **Judges:** Diamantis, Griffin, Harris
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7631323

## Opinion text

DIAMANTIS, Judge.
Anthony Brown challenges the legality of his sentence, claiming that the trial court erred in computing his sentencing guidelines scoresheet because the court utilized a multiplier in assessing legal constraint points. See Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1991). We conclude that this matter must be remanded to the trial court for a hearing because the instant record does not contain the pertinent documents concerning the sentence which was imposed following an earlier reversal by this court. Brown v. State, 581 So.2d 242 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).
VACATED; REMANDED for a hearing.
HARRIS, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7631323. Public record. Not legal advice.