# In re Beard

> Supreme Court of Louisiana · December 21, 1992 · 609 So. 2d 245

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7624808

## Case

- **Full name:** In re Orscini L. BEARD
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Louisiana
- **Decided:** December 21, 1992
- **Citations:** 609 So. 2d 245; 1992 La. LEXIS 3849; 1992 WL 382161
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Dennis, Lemmon, Reasons
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7624808

## Opinion text

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
PER CURIAM.
Respondent, Orscini L. Beard, pled guilty in federal court to one count of making a false declaration under penalty of perjury in his personal bankruptcy proceeding in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152 . On October 6, 1989, he was sentenced to be imprisoned for a term of 27 months, supervised probation for two years, and a fine of $103,-421.35. The fine was reduced to $50,000.00 upon remand after an appeal. See U.S. v. Beard, 913 F.2d 193 (5th Cir.1990).
On petition of disciplinary counsel, this Court ordered respondent suspended from the practice of law pending further orders of the Court, pursuant to Rule XIX, § 19. The court further ordered that disciplinary proceedings be instituted in accordance with Rule XIX, §§11 and 19. See Disciplinary Counsel v. Orscini L. Beard, 570 So.2d 450 (La.1990).
Following hearings before Hearing Committee No. 1 and the Disciplinary Board, the Board filed its report, recommending disbarment. Respondent filed an opposition urging that a lesser discipline be imposed. Oral argument was presented by the parties.
After review of the Board’s report, the extensive well-articulated findings of the Hearing Committee, and the record, we conclude that the gravity of the offense committed by respondent, viewed in light of mitigating circumstances, does not warrant disbarment. The maximum three-year suspension is a more appropriate discipline.
DECREE
Accordingly, it is ordered that respondent, Orscini L. Beard, be and he is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years to run from the date of his interim suspension by this Court, November 15, 1990. All costs of these proceedings are assessed to the respondent.
SUSPENSION ORDERED.
DENNIS and LEMMON, JJ., dissents with reasons.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7624808. Public record. Not legal advice.