# Brown v. Dealers Insurance Co.

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · April 8, 1992 · 595 So. 2d 1118

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7599429

## Case

- **Full name:** Daniel P. BROWN v. DEALERS INSURANCE COMPANY and Florida Managing General Agency, Inc., 555, DEALERS INSURANCE COMPANY and Florida Managing General Agency, Inc., 555 v. Betty C. KIRKPATRICK d/b/a Kirkpatrick Insurance Agency, Cross-Appellee
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** April 8, 1992
- **Citations:** 595 So. 2d 1118; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4474; 1992 WL 69039
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Shivers
- **Judges:** Miner, Shivers, Wolf
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7599429

## Opinion text

SHIVERS, Judge.
We affirm that portion of the trial court’s Final Judgment in favor of Dealers Insurance Company (Dealers) and Florida Managing General Agency, Inc., # 555, entered on the verdict of the jury on the claim of Daniel P. Brown. As to Brown’s claim against Betty C. Kirkpatrick, d/b/a Kirkpatrick Insurance Agency, we find that the questions were properly submitted to the jury, and we reverse the judgment non *1119 obstante veredicto and direct that the jury verdict in favor of Brown and against Kirkpatrick be reinstated and judgment in favor of Brown and against Betty C. Kirkpatrick d/b/a Kirkpatrick Insurance Agency be entered thereon. In view of our disposition, it is unnecessary to reach the issues raised by Dealers on cross-appeal.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with directions.
MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7599429. Public record. Not legal advice.