# Robertson v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medicine

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · June 19, 1990 · 574 So. 2d 153

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7588927

## Case

- **Full name:** James G. ROBERTSON, M.D. v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF MEDICINE
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** June 19, 1990
- **Citations:** 574 So. 2d 153; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4516; 1990 WL 85424
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Ford, Miner, Ret, Smith, Thompson, Wolf
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7588927

## Opinion text

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
In our original opinion we noted (see footnote 1) the absence from the record of certain depositions, transcript of proceedings before the Board, and exhibits before the hearing officer. In his motion for rehearing, appellant moved for leave to supplement the record. We granted appellant’s motion, and appellant thereafter designated, and the Department supplied, the depositions of Drs. Litton and Baker, and the transcript of proceedings before the Board. Having reviewed the supplemental record, and finding nothing to alter our decision based upon the record as initially presented, we adhere to our opinion and decision filed on June 19, 1990, deny rehearing, and order that mandate be issued in accordance therewith.
SMITH, MINER and WOLF * , JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7588927. Public record. Not legal advice.