# Brown v. State

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · November 22, 1988 · 533 So. 2d 933

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7570070

## Case

- **Full name:** Otis BROWN, Jr., a/k/a Otis Lamar Brown v. The STATE of Florida
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** November 22, 1988
- **Citations:** 533 So. 2d 933
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Ferguson, Pearson, Schwartz
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7570070

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
The defendant contends, the State concedes, and we agree, that findings set forth in Paragraphs 2 and 5 of the Order of Revocation of Probation must be stricken from the Order because the trial court made no such findings at the conclusion of the revocation hearing, and no evidence was adduced to support such findings. See Higgs v. State, 470 So.2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Robinson v. State, 468 So.2d 1106 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Delgado v. State, 423 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Remanded with directions to amend the Order of Revocation of Probation by striking Paragraphs 2 and 5 of the findings.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7570070. Public record. Not legal advice.
