# Moore v. Board of Adjustment

> Supreme Court of Alabama · January 31, 1986 · 495 So. 2d 1112

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7552664

## Case

- **Full name:** Ex Parte John L. Moore, III. (Re Anna Monette Mareno and G. Wildon Mareno v. Board of Adjustment of City of Mobile and John L. Moore, III, Intervenor).
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** January 31, 1986
- **Citations:** 495 So. 2d 1112; 1986 Ala. LEXIS 3423
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Houston
- **Judges:** Houston, Torbert, Faulkner, Beatty, Adams
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7552664

## Opinion text

HOUSTON, Justice.
The Court of Civil Appeals’ reversal, 495 So.2d 1109 , should be construed as holding only that respondents have established a prima facie case. The strong language of *1113 that court’s opinion should not be construed as creating a presumption in respondents’ favor. Variances are disfavored. The remandment is without prejudice to petitioner’s right to put on his evidence. Rule 41(b), Ala.R.Civ.P.
WRIT DENIED.
TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, BEATTY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7552664. Public record. Not legal advice.