# State v. C.C.

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · March 24, 1983 · 449 So. 2d 280

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7533478

## Case

- **Full name:** The STATE of Florida v. C.C., E.V., C.A.Q., A.M.E., and S.E., juveniles
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** March 24, 1983
- **Citations:** 449 So. 2d 280; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18931
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Ferguson
- **Judges:** Barkdull, Bas, Baskin, Ferguson, Hendry, Hubbart, Jorgenson, Kin, Nesbitt, Pearson, Schwartz
- **Cited by:** 32 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7533478

## Opinion text

FERGUSON, Judge
(dissenting).
I entirely disagree with the majority holding that there is no vehicle for review of an order of the juvenile court — by appeal or certiorari — and would, without burdening the Southern Reporter with another opinion, adopt the holding and sound reasoning of State v. J.P.W., 433 So.2d 616 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (which is critical of the original opinion in this case) and State v. W.A.M., 412 So.2d 49 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 419 So.2d 1201 (Fla.1982). Furthermore, R.J.B. v. State, 408 So.2d 1048 (Fla.1982) makes it very clear that Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140 is applicable to juvenile proceedings.
HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7533478. Public record. Not legal advice.