# Bevier v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medical Examiners

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · August 3, 1983 · 436 So. 2d 297

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7527695

## Case

- **Full name:** Robert L. BEVIER, M.D. v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** August 3, 1983
- **Citations:** 436 So. 2d 297; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20181
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Smith
- **Judges:** Nimmons, Shivers, Smith
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7527695

## Opinion text

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Judge,
specially concurring.
I concur in the affirmance and write only to advise counsel and the parties that the court did not casually abandon the concerns expressed at oral argument over the Board’s apparent resort to evidence dehors the charging instrument in characterizing the subject conduct and in setting a penalty. Counsel did not advise us at argument of the colloquy at R. 37-40. Concerning the question of suspension or revocation, the Board’s rule discussed at argument does not appear to pertain to the particular violation charged.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7527695. Public record. Not legal advice.