# City of Alachua v. Matilsky

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · December 1, 1982 · 423 So. 2d 451

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7522227

## Case

- **Full name:** CITY OF ALACHUA, Florida, a municipal corporation, and Cross-Appellee v. Herbert MATILSKY, Barbara Matilsky, Rupert Murphy, Robert N. Worth, Robert W. Rogers, Kenneth M. Brown, Viola M. Brown, and Jule E. Schmidt, and
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** December 1, 1982
- **Citations:** 423 So. 2d 451; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28668
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Smith
- **Judges:** McCord, Mills, Smith
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7522227

## Opinion text

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Chief Judge.
The trial court correctly held, at the instance of appellee Schmidt, that Alachua’s ordinances annexing certain territory violate the contiguity requirement and other requirements of chapter 171, Florida Statutes. We find it unnecessary to reach, and so do not decide, questions on the cross-appeal concerning the standing of other objectors.
AFFIRMED.
McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7522227. Public record. Not legal advice.