# Broward County v. Plantation Imports, Inc.

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · September 29, 1982 · 419 So. 2d 1145

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7520442

## Case

- **Full name:** BROWARD COUNTY v. PLANTATION IMPORTS, INC.
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** September 29, 1982
- **Citations:** 419 So. 2d 1145; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21684
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Anstead
- **Judges:** Anstead, Downey, Glickstein
- **Cited by:** 36 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7520442

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that provisions of a county ordinance authorizing assessment of penalties by county agency was unconstitutional, and agreeing with conclusion reached in Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 79-109 (1979). 4 Section 112.061 (11)(b
- holding that the provisions of a county ordinance authorizing assessment of penalties by county agency was unconstitutional, and agreeing with conclusion in Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 79-109
- holding that the provision of a county ordinance authorizing assessment of penalties by county agency was unconstitutional, and agreeing with conclusion in Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 79-109
- holding that the provisions of a county ordinance authorizing assessment of penalties by a county agency was unconstitutional, and agreeing with the conclusion reached in AGO 79-109
- holding that provisions of county ordinance authorizing assessment of penalties by county agency was unconstitutional and agreeing with conclusion in Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 79-109

## Opinion text

ANSTEAD, Judge,
specially concurring:
The only argument made by the county in defense of its ordinance in the trial court was that the subsequent act of the legislature authorizing the county to enact a consumer protection ordinance complete with penalties, somehow validated the original ordinance. I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the county’s assertion is without merit.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7520442. Public record. Not legal advice.