# Brown v. Brown

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · September 24, 1980 · 388 So. 2d 623

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7505468

## Case

- **Full name:** Linda K. BROWN v. John T. BROWN
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** September 24, 1980
- **Citations:** 388 So. 2d 623; 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17265
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Anstead
- **Judges:** Anstead, Beranek, Moore
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7505468

## Opinion text

ANSTEAD, Judge.
In a final judgment of dissolution the wife was initially awarded custody of the parties’ minor children. Because the wife refused to comply with a subsequent court order directing her to bring herself and the children from New Jersey to Florida, the court ordered the custody of the children transferred to the husband. No hearing was conducted or findings made as to whether transfer of custody would be in the best interests of the children.
This court has previously recognized that a trial court has broad discretion to effect compliance with its orders. Gordon v. Gordon, 368 So.2d 1356 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). However, before an order may be entered modifying the custody provisions of a final judgment or otherwise transferring custody, a determination must be made that a change in custody is in the best interests of the children. Baker v. Baker, 360 So.2d 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). The transfer of custody of minor children should not be used as a means of punishing recalcitrant parties to dissolution proceedings. When a change in custody is sought nothing less than a showing that such change is required to serve the best interests of the child will justify granting such a change.
Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded with directions for further proceedings consistent herewith.
MOORE, J., concurs.
BERANEK, J., concurs with opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7505468. Public record. Not legal advice.