# In re Supreme Court Special Committee for Lawyer Disciplinary Procedures to Amend Integration Rule, Article II & Article XI

> Supreme Court of Florida · May 24, 1979 · 373 So. 2d 1

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7497776

## Case

- **Full name:** Petition of SUPREME COURT SPECIAL COMMITTEE FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES TO AMEND INTEGRATION RULE, ARTICLE II AND ARTICLE XI
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Florida
- **Decided:** May 24, 1979
- **Citations:** 373 So. 2d 1; 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4787
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Alderman
- **Judges:** Adkins, Alderman, Boyd, England, Hatchett, Overton, Sundberg
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7497776

## Opinion text

ALDERMAN, Justice,
concurring in part, dissenting in part.
I would grant all five requests made by The Florida Bar in its'petition for rehearing.
BOYD and OVERTON, JJ., concur only as to request (4).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7497776. Public record. Not legal advice.