# In re Supreme Court Special Committee for Lawyer Disciplinary Procedures to Amend Integration Rule, Article II & Article XI

> Supreme Court of Florida · May 24, 1979 · 373 So. 2d 1

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7497775

## Case

- **Full name:** Petition of SUPREME COURT SPECIAL COMMITTEE FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES TO AMEND INTEGRATION RULE, ARTICLE II AND ARTICLE XI
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Florida
- **Decided:** May 24, 1979
- **Citations:** 373 So. 2d 1; 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4787
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Sundberg
- **Judges:** Adkins, Alderman, Boyd, England, Hatchett, Overton, Sundberg
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7497775

## Opinion text

SUNDBERG, Justice,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur with this Court’s opinion on rehearing insofar as it goes. However, in addition I would grant the Bar’s application for an extension of time in which to make an additional request for rehearing. It is my understanding that the board of governors seeks such additional time in order to obtain clarification of certain portions of the Court’s original opinion. Because the original opinion in this case made substantial revisions in the disciplinary procedures for the Bar, it does not appear inappropriate to grant additional time to The Florida Bar so that our new procedures may be fully clarified before the Bar commences to function under the new procedures.
Accordingly, I dissent from the majority’s denial of request No. 5.
HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7497775. Public record. Not legal advice.