# In re Supreme Court Special Committee for Lawyer Disciplinary Procedures to Amend Integration Rule, Article II & Article XI

> Supreme Court of Florida · May 24, 1979 · 373 So. 2d 1

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7497770

## Case

- **Full name:** Petition of SUPREME COURT SPECIAL COMMITTEE FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES TO AMEND INTEGRATION RULE, ARTICLE II AND ARTICLE XI
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Florida
- **Decided:** May 24, 1979
- **Citations:** 373 So. 2d 1; 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4787
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by England
- **Judges:** Adkins, Alderman, Boyd, England, Hatchett, Overton, Sundberg
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7497770

## Opinion text

ENGLAND, Chief Justice,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur with the adoption of the rules proposed with two exceptions. As would Justice Overton, I would adopt proposed rules 11.04(3) and 11.13(1) to expedite disciplinary proceedings before the grievance committees.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7497770. Public record. Not legal advice.