# Peterson Outdoor Advertising v. Department of Transportation

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · March 23, 1979 · 369 So. 2d 94

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7495750

## Case

- **Full name:** PETERSON OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, BREVARD COUNTY, BOARD NO. 3304 v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** March 23, 1979
- **Citations:** 369 So. 2d 94; 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14767
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Ervin
- **Judges:** Booth, Ervin, Mills
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7495750

## Opinion text

ERVIN, Judge,
concurring in part and
dissenting in part.
I concur in the conclusion reached by the majority only because it does not appear from the record that Peterson received that notice required by § 479.07(3), Fla.Stat. (1975). I otherwise dissent for the reasons stated in my concurring and dissenting opinion in White Advertising International v. Dept. of Transportation, 368 So.2d 411 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7495750. Public record. Not legal advice.