# Hampton v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York

> Louisiana Court of Appeal · January 9, 1967 · 197 So. 2d 911

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7422549

## Case

- **Full name:** Rudolph C. HAMPTON v. The FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK
- **Court:** Louisiana Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** January 9, 1967
- **Citations:** 197 So. 2d 911; 1967 La. App. LEXIS 5708
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing by Janvier
- **Judges:** Barnette, Chasez, Jan, Janvier, Regan, Samuel, Vier, Yarrut
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7422549

## Opinion text

ON REHEARING
JANVIER, Judge.
We granted a rehearing because we felt that possibly, in affirming the judgment of the district court, we had been, influenced rather by the statements of one of the doctors and of the district judge concerning the sincerity of the plaintiff than by an evaluation of the medical evidence.
We have carefully considered the record and, while we entertain some doubt as to the correctness of the finding below, we do not feel that we can say that the judgment is manifestly erroneous. Accordingly, our original opinion and decree are reinstated and made final.
■Original decree reinstáted and made final.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7422549. Public record. Not legal advice.