# Robertson v. Coffee

> Louisiana Court of Appeal · February 8, 1951 · 50 So. 2d 659

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7404014

## Case

- **Full name:** ROBERTSON v. COFFEE
- **Court:** Louisiana Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** February 8, 1951
- **Citations:** 50 So. 2d 659; 1951 La. App. LEXIS 574
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Hardy
- **Judges:** Hardy, Taliaferro
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7404014

## Opinion text

HARDY, J.,
concurring.
While I agree with the conclusion reached ’ by the majority of the Court, I am not in. *663 complete agreement with the application of the principles of law, as enunciated in the opinion, to the facts of the case at hand. It seems to me that the obvious reason for the rejection of the defense lies in the complete failure of defendant to sustain the burden of his defense by the requisite preponderance of proof.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7404014. Public record. Not legal advice.