# In re S.D.J.

> Court of Appeals of North Carolina · September 2, 2008 · 192 N.C. App. 478

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7397067

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of S.D.J.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of North Carolina
- **Decided:** September 2, 2008
- **Citations:** 192 N.C. App. 478; 665 S.E.2d 818
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Stroud
- **Judges:** Hunter, Stroud
- **Cited by:** 38 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7397067

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- concluding that statutory ground of neglect was supported by evidence that respondent had failed to make any significant progress on her case plan to address her mental health issues
- explaining that blood test results are records made in the usually course of business

## Opinion text

STROUD, Judge, dissenting.
For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in In re N.C.H., G.D.H., and D.G.H.
*825 (No. COA08-413), filed simultaneously with this case, I respectfully dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7397067. Public record. Not legal advice.