# In re Zielyk

> Supreme Court of New Jersey · June 15, 2017 · 229 N.J. 331

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7331333

## Case

- **Full name:** IN THE MATTER OF ANDREY V. ZIELYK, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 026891986)
- **Court:** Supreme Court of New Jersey
- **Decided:** June 15, 2017
- **Citations:** 229 N.J. 331; 162 A.3d 288; 2017 N.J. LEXIS 636; 2017 WL 2591455
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7331333

## Opinion text

ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-165, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(f)(default by respondent), that ANDREY V. ZIELYK, formerly of PARSIPPANY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 198 6, and who has been *332 temporarily suspended from the practice of law since February 10, 2015, should be censured for violating RPC 8.1(b)(failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities) and RPC 8.4(d) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that ANDREY V. ZIELYK is hereby censured; and it is further
ORDERED that ANDREY V. ZIELYK remain suspended from practice pursuant to the Orders of the Court filed February 10, 2015, and September 24, 2015, and until further Order; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7331333. Public record. Not legal advice.