# Charles L. Freeze v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · December 30, 1996 · 104 F.3d 358

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/732799

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 30, 1996
- **Citations:** 104 F.3d 358; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37997; 1996 WL 741098
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/732799

## Opinion text

104 F.3d 358
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Charles L. FREEZE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 96-1693.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 19, 1996.
Decided Dec. 30, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-554-4)
Charles L. Freeze, Appellant Pro Se.
John Warren Stone, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Freeze v. Brown, No. CA-94-554-4 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/732799. Public record. Not legal advice.