# Debold v. Township of Monroe

> New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 11, 1971 · 114 N.J. Super. 502

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7313092

## Case

- **Full name:** WILLIAM DEBOLD, GEORGE FULLER AND FREDERICK SMITHLINE, TRUSTEES IN LIQUIDATION OF CAMBRIDGE DEVELOPMENT CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORP. v. TOWNSHIP OF MONROE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, MONROE PLANNING BOARD AND JOSEPH INDYK, INDIVIDUALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
- **Court:** New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
- **Decided:** May 11, 1971
- **Citations:** 114 N.J. Super. 502; 277 A.2d 404; 1971 N.J. Super. LEXIS 642
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7313092

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the reported opinion of Judge Furman, 110 N. J. Super. 287.
This affirmance is without prejudice to plaintiffs’ right to apply to the Board of Adjustment of the Township of Monroe for variances from the 1957 zoning ordinance for their respective parcels of realty.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7313092. Public record. Not legal advice.
