# Brazer v. Borough of Mountainside

> New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · February 24, 1969 · 104 N.J. Super. 456

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7312334

## Case

- **Full name:** SAUL BRAZER AND GLORIA BRAZER, HIS WIFE v. BOROUGH OF MOUNTAINSIDE, IN THE COUNTY OF UNION, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF MOUNTAINSIDE IN THE COUNTY OF UNION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
- **Court:** New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
- **Decided:** February 24, 1969
- **Citations:** 104 N.J. Super. 456; 250 A.2d 418; 1969 N.J. Super. LEXIS 598
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7312334

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge William E. Wood in the Law Division. 102 N. J. Super. 497 (1968). See, also, Smith v. Morris Tp. Comm., 101 N. J. Super. 271, 280 (App. Div. 1968).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7312334. Public record. Not legal advice.