# Union Township Teachers Ass'n ex rel. Allen v. Board of Education

> Supreme Court of New Jersey · June 24, 1982 · 90 N.J. 161

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7303688

## Case

- **Full name:** UNION TOWNSHIP TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, ON BEHALF OF: ROBERT ALLEN, GERARD ANDERSON, EDWARD BEACH, JOSEPH CALIGUIRE, SALVATORE CICCOTELLI, NELSON CLAYPOOLE, GENE CONSALES, PAUL CORRIGAN, JOHN D'ALESSIO, ALBERT D'AMATO, JOSEPH DiMATTIO, ROBERT DREW, ROBERT FADDEN, LOUIS FARANDA, HOWARD FENTON, FRANK GARGANO, JOHN GARRABRANT, ERNEST GEBLER, SIDNEY GORDON, ROBERT GREBE, ALBERT GREENBERG, PHILIP GUIDA, ROBERT HASSARD, THERESA HATALOSKY, WILLIAM HAZELTON, GEORGE HOPKINS, JOHN KNODEL, JEROME KRACHT, GORDON LeMATTY, ROBERT LINZ, WILLIAM MARVIN, GERARD MATTE, LAURA MELEN, NICHOLAS NUGENT, ROBERT PATTON, KENNETH PINNEY, JACK ROLAND, GOODROW RYAN, ANTHONY SAPARITO, JOHN SHAFFER, WALTER SHALLCROSS, WILLIAM SHORTLIDGE, SEYMOUR SIMON, HERBERT SMITH, SIDNEY SMITH, EMANUEL SOLOMON, DONALD SUMMERKAMP, HOWARD STEIN, MICHAEL STRANO, FLORENCE SULLIVAN, JACK TRAGER, KERMIT VOGEL, JOSEPH WALSH, MARTIN ZWILLMAN, AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOWNSHIP OF UNION, UNION COUNTY
- **Court:** Supreme Court of New Jersey
- **Decided:** June 24, 1982
- **Citations:** 90 N.J. 161; 447 A.2d 524; 1982 N.J. LEXIS 2146
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Pashman
- **Judges:** Pashman, Schreiber
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7303688

## Opinion text

PASHMAN, J.,
dissenting.,
I dissent from the Court’s decision regarding the applicability of laches and the contract statute of limitations to this ease, for the reasons expressed in my dissent in Lavin v. Board of Education of Hackensack, 90 N.J. 145 (1982). I would hold that the statute of limitations applies, but not laches.
Justice CLIFFORD and Justice HANDLER join in this opinion.
For modification and affirmance—Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices SCHREIBER, POLLOCK and O’HERN-4.
For reversal and remandment—Justices PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and HANDLER—3.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7303688. Public record. Not legal advice.