# State Board of Medical Examiners v. Dussinger

> Supreme Court of New Jersey · April 9, 1931 · 9 N.J. Misc. 423

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7290580

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS OF NEW JERSEY v. ELIZABETH DUSSINGER
- **Court:** Supreme Court of New Jersey
- **Decided:** April 9, 1931
- **Citations:** 9 N.J. Misc. 423; 154 A. 325; 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 368
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7290580

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari in this case brings up for review a determination of the Eirst District Court of the city of Newark, that the defendant had not violated section 10 of an act to regulate the practice of medicine. Pamph. L. 1894, p. 454, as amended.
The District Court judge found that there were no electrical treatments given. The signs displayed indicated that the place was a gymnasium where baths and massage were given. The devices employed were baths, heat, massage and an electrical vibrator, together with heat from a sun ray lamp.
After carefully examining the whole record, we reach the conclusion that the evidence supports the findings of the court below.
The writ will, therefore, be dismissed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7290580. Public record. Not legal advice.