# William Edward Brown v. Ronald J. Angelone

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · October 25, 1996 · 99 F.3d 1129

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/728994

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 25, 1996
- **Citations:** 99 F.3d 1129; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40118; 1996 WL 614779
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/728994

## Opinion text

99 F.3d 1129
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Edward BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Ronald J. ANGELONE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 96-7017.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 17, 1996.
Decided Oct. 25, 1996.
William Edward Brown, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant seeks to appeal from the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Angelone, No. CA-95-1174-R (W.D.Va. May 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/728994. Public record. Not legal advice.
