# United States v. Phillip Charles Brown, Reverend

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · October 2, 1996 · 97 F.3d 1449

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/727517

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 2, 1996
- **Citations:** 97 F.3d 1449; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30620; 1996 WL 558378
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/727517

## Opinion text

97 F.3d 1449
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Phillip Charles BROWN, Reverend, Defendant--Appellant.
No. 96-6821.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 20, 1996
Decided Oct. 2, 1996
Phillip Charles Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Manuelian, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
D.Md.
DISMISSED.
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brown, Nos. CR-91-250-WMN; CA-95-3387-WMN (D.Md. May 9, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/727517. Public record. Not legal advice.