# Larry Joe Stevens v. Virginia Parole Board

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 27, 1996 · 91 F.3d 133

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/722915

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 27, 1996
- **Citations:** 91 F.3d 133; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35175; 1996 WL 379773
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/722915

## Opinion text

91 F.3d 133
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Larry Joe STEVENS, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, Respondent--Appellee.
No. 96-6157.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 16, 1996.
Decided June 27, 1996.
Larry Joe Stevens, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Stevens v. Virginia Parole Board, No. CA-95-1162-AM (E.D.Va. Dec. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/722915. Public record. Not legal advice.