# Michael W. Owens v. John Taylor Michael A. Shupe Maybelle Brown, and Malcolm A. Booker, Jr.

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · July 31, 1996 · 91 F.3d 132

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/722901

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 31, 1996
- **Citations:** 91 F.3d 132; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35160; 1996 WL 426562
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/722901

## Opinion text

91 F.3d 132
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael W. OWENS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John TAYLOR; Michael A. Shupe; Maybelle Brown, Defendants-Appellees,
and
Malcolm A. Booker, Jr., Defendant.
No. 96-6320.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 23, 1996.
Decided: July 31, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-95-356-R)
Michael W. Owens, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Owens v. Taylor, No. CA-95-356-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 20, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/722901. Public record. Not legal advice.