# Theron Johnny Maxton v. State Board of Medical Examiners State Board of Nursing South Carolina Department of Corrections

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · July 9, 1996 · 91 F.3d 131

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/722848

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 9, 1996
- **Citations:** 91 F.3d 131; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35109; 1996 WL 380819
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/722848

## Opinion text

91 F.3d 131
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Theron Johnny MAXTON, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS; State Board of Nursing;
South Carolina Department of Corrections,
Defendants--Appellees.
No. 96-6675.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 20, 1996.
Decided July 9, 1996.
Theron Johnny Maxton, Appellant Pro Se.
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Maxton v. State Board of Medical Examiners, No. CA-96-889-3-6BC (D.S.C. Apr. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/722848. Public record. Not legal advice.