# Brown v. Edmonds

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 29, 2003 · 63 F. App'x 774

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7217812

## Case

- **Full name:** Demarcus M. BROWN v. Brett EDMONDS N. Comer Daniel Braxton
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 29, 2003
- **Citations:** 63 F. App'x 774
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Hamilton, King, Luttig
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7217812

## Opinion text

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
PER CURIAM:
Demarcus M. Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea *775 soning of the district court. See Brown v. Edmonds, No. CA-03-132-7 (W.D.Va. filed Feb. 25, 2003 & entered Feb. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7217812. Public record. Not legal advice.