# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · April 18, 2003 · 61 F. App'x 485

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7217110

## Case

- **Full name:** United States v. Darelle Lashawn BROWN
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 18, 2003
- **Citations:** 61 F. App'x 485
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Fisher, Kleinfeld, Rymer
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7217110

## Opinion text

MEMORANDUM **
Darelle Lashawn Brown appeals the sentence imposed after revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3732 . We review for abuse of discretion the district court’s departure from the policy statement range set forth in U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4, United States v. Musa, 220 F.3d 1096, 1100 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.
Review of the record shows that, prior to sentencing Brown, the district court considered the policy statement range for Brown’s violation set forth in U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4, and it complied with 18 U.S.C. § 3553 by stating its reasons for departing from this range. See Musa, 220 F.3d at 1101 ; United States v. Tadeo, 222 F.3d 623, 626 (9th Cir.2000). Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion by sentencing Brown outside of the policy statement range set forth in U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4. See Tadeo, 222 F.3d at 625-26 .
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7217110. Public record. Not legal advice.