# Padilla v. Workers Compensation Appeals Board

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · March 14, 2003 · 58 F. App'x 364

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7216117

## Case

- **Full name:** Dina PADILLA v. WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 14, 2003
- **Citations:** 58 F. App'x 364
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7216117

## Opinion text

MEMORANDUM **
Dina Padilla appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing her action, which alleged the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board deprived her of constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo and may affirm on any ground supported by the record. Steckman v. Hart Brewing, Inc., 143 F.3d 1293, 1295 (9th Cir.1998). We affirm because Padilla’s action effectively seeks review of a final, state court decision. See Fontana Empire Center, LLC v. City of Fontana, 307 F.3d 987, 992 (9th Cir.2002) (federal district courts lack jurisdiction to review final, state court judgments).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7216117. Public record. Not legal advice.