# Sadiq v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · August 30, 2002 · 43 F. App'x 701

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7211046

## Case

- **Full name:** Afrah SADIQ v. U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent Afrah Sadiq v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 30, 2002
- **Citations:** 43 F. App'x 701
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7211046

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated petitions for review, Afrah Sadiq seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) orders: (1) denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings (No. 98-1928); and (2) denying her motion for reconsideration of the denial of her first motion to reopen and denying her second motion to reopen (No. 02-1306). We have reviewed the administrative records and the Board’s decisions and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying these motions. See 8 C.F.R. § 3.2 (a) (2002); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 , 112 S.Ct. 719 , 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny both petitions for review on the reasoning of the Board. See Sadiq v. INS, No. A72-418-396 (B.I.A. May 28, 1998 & Feb. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITIONS DENIED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7211046. Public record. Not legal advice.