# Hopkins v. Indeterminate Sentence Review Board

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · July 30, 2002 · 43 F. App'x 123

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7210908

## Case

- **Full name:** Dennis R. HOPKINS v. INDETERMINATE SENTENCE REVIEW BOARD
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 30, 2002
- **Citations:** 43 F. App'x 123
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7210908

## Opinion text

MEMORANDUM **
Dennis R. Hopkins, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
In his objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, Hopkins conceded that he had had three or more actions dismissed as frivolous or malicious or for failure to state a claim. In his objections and in his complaint, he alleged serious side effects from taking anti-psychotropic drugs. The district court properly concluded that section 1915(g)’s exception for “imminent danger of serious physical injury” did not apply and that Hopkins could proceed only if he paid the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7210908. Public record. Not legal advice.