# United States v. Zebrowski

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 24, 2002 · 37 F. App'x 709

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7209195

## Case

- **Full name:** United States v. Stephen ZEBROWSKI, Jr., a/k/a Junior, a/k/a Lewis Brady, a/k/a Stevon Green, a/k/a Edward Cartwight, a/k/a Felex C. Brown
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 24, 2002
- **Citations:** 37 F. App'x 709
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7209195

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
Stephen Zebrowski, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying his motion requesting “nunc pro tunc designation for an order specifically setting aside” his fine. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Zebrowski’s challenge to his fine is precluded under res judicata, because he previously litigated this claim. Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 94 , 101 S.Ct. 411 , 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980); Meekins v. United Transp. Union, 946 F.2d 1054, 1057 (4th Cir.1991). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying Zebrowski’s motion. United States v. Zebrowski, No. CR-96-41 (E.D.Va. Jan. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7209195. Public record. Not legal advice.