# James O. Brown v. Michael Moore, Director of Department of Corrections Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 29, 1996 · 86 F.3d 1148

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/719843

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 29, 1996
- **Citations:** 86 F.3d 1148; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 42173; 1996 WL 285580
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/719843

## Opinion text

86 F.3d 1148
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James O. BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Michael MOORE, Director of Department of Corrections;
Attorney General of the State of South Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.
No. 95-7880.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 16, 1996.
Decided: May 29, 1996.
James O. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Moore, No. CA-95-755-6-22AK (D.S.C. Nov. 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/719843. Public record. Not legal advice.