# Eric D. Harris v. Virginia Parole Board Virginia Department of Corrections Attorney General of Virginia

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 2, 1996 · 85 F.3d 616

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/718934

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 2, 1996
- **Citations:** 85 F.3d 616; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 31970; 1996 WL 220842
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/718934

## Opinion text

85 F.3d 616
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Eric D. HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD; Virginia Department of Corrections;
Attorney General of Virginia, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 95-8545.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 15, 1996.
Decided May 2, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-1277-R)
Eric D. Harris, Appellant Pro Se.
W.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Harris v. Virginia Parole Bd., No. CA-95-1277-R (W.D.Va. Dec. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/718934. Public record. Not legal advice.