# Martin v. Blanchin

> Supreme Court of Louisiana · April 15, 1861 · 16 La. Ann. 237

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7186986

## Case

- **Full name:** P. P. J. Martin v. P. C. Blanchin and Antoine Giraud
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Louisiana
- **Decided:** April 15, 1861
- **Citations:** 16 La. Ann. 237
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing by Buchanan
- **Judges:** Buchanan
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7186986

## Opinion text

Same Case. — On an Application eor a Re-hearing.
Buchanan, J.
Plaintifis ask for a re-hearing, upon the authority of three decisions, not cited in argument before judgment.
It is contended by counsel that our decision is inconsistent with two cases decided by our predecessors, Brown v. Union Insurance Company, 3 An. 177, and Starke v. Burke, Watt & Co., 5 An. 740; also with the case of Pratt v. McHatton, 11th An. 260, decided by the present Bench.
Brown v. The Union Insurance Company and Starke v. Burke, Watt & Co. were cases of insolvent corporations, and the appointments were made by the court, ex necessitate, in the absence of parties able to appoint a liquidator or Receiver.
In Pratt v. McHatton, no objection seems to have been made to the appointment of a Receiver, until the case was in the Supreme Court on appeal, and the objects of the appointment had been accomplished by the sale of the assets of the partnership.
These cases are manifestly inapplicable to the pi’esent issue.
Re-hearing refused.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7186986. Public record. Not legal advice.