# Armour & Co. v. Board of State Affairs

> Supreme Court of Louisiana · March 24, 1924 · 156 La. 661

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7173683

## Case

- **Full name:** ARMOUR & CO., Limited v. BOARD OF STATE AFFAIRS
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Louisiana
- **Decided:** March 24, 1924
- **Citations:** 156 La. 661; 101 So. 13; 1924 La. LEXIS 2072
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Brunot, Niell, Rogers
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7173683

## Opinion text

On Application for Rehearing.
By the WHOLE COURT.
PER CURIAM.
It appears that the views which we have expressed in the present suit are in conflict with the opinion in Colonial Sugars Co. v. Board of State Affairs et al. (two cases) 154 La. 971 , 98 South. 546 . If the former opinion is correct, the present opinion is incorrect, and vice versa.
After re-examining the legal questions involved, we prefer to adhere to our present opinion as containing the correct exposition of the law. Opinion in the cases of Colonial Sugars Co. v. Board of State Affairs et al., referred to supra, are, therefore, expressly overruled.
Rehearing refused.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7173683. Public record. Not legal advice.