# United States v. Shorter

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 29, 2002 · 31 F. App'x 828

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7127280

## Case

- **Full name:** United States v. William SHORTER, Jr., Defendant-Appellant United States of America v. William Shorter, Jr., Defendant-Appellant United States of America v. William Shorter, Jr., Defendant-Appellant United States of America v. William Shorter, Jr.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 29, 2002
- **Citations:** 31 F. App'x 828
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7127280

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
William Shorter, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for stenographic notes and records relating to three of his co-conspirators: Lebby, *829 Brown, and Roberts. He also appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s Aug. 27, 2001, order denying access to records. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Shorter, No. CA-98-192-A (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 21, 2001 & entered Dec. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7127280. Public record. Not legal advice.