# State v. Dickey

> Court of Appeals of Kansas · June 27, 2014 · 50 Kan. App. 2d 468

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7125442

## Case

- **Full name:** State of Kansas v. Jeff Dickey
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Kansas
- **Decided:** June 27, 2014
- **Citations:** 50 Kan. App. 2d 468; 329 P.3d 1230; 2014 Kan. App. LEXIS 44; 2014 WL 2900957
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Plerron
- **Judges:** Bruns, Pierron, Plerron, Standridge
- **Cited by:** 45 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7125442

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- describing die holding and analysis in Murdock as “firmly tethered” to the text of K.S.A. 21-471 l[e] and thus limited to out-of-state convictions

## Opinion text

PlERRON, J.,
concurring: I agree with the majority that the crime in question must be classified as a nonperson felony. However, I believe we need only cite to State v. Murdock, 299 Kan. 312, 319 , 323 P.3d 846 (2014), where the court, after explaining the need to find the two prior out-of-state convictions must be scored as nonperson felonies states: “We recognize this rule results in the classification of all pre-1993 crimes as nonperson felonies — an outcome the State characterizes as unreasonable. But the solution to the State’s complaint sits with the legislature.”

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7125442. Public record. Not legal advice.