# Brown v. Guilory

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 25, 1996 · 76 F.3d 371

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/712327

## Case

- **Full name:** Michael Lynn Brown v. Don Guilory, Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center Larry Jarvis, Assistant Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center Jack Lee, Assistant Warden, Augusta Correctional Center Bobby Soles, Assistant Warden, Buckingham Correctional Center
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 25, 1996
- **Citations:** 76 F.3d 371; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6841; 1996 WL 28666
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/712327

## Opinion text

76 F.3d 371
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael Lynn BROWN, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Don GUILORY, Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center; Larry
Jarvis, Assistant Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center;
Jack Lee, Assistant Warden, Augusta Correctional Center;
Bobby Soles, Assistant Warden, Buckingham Correctional
Center, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-7834.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 25, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-523)
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
Michael Lynn Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee ordGer. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/712327. Public record. Not legal advice.