# Andre Brown Nelson v. Edward W. Murray, Director

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 23, 1996 · 74 F.3d 1232

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/711389

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 23, 1996
- **Citations:** 74 F.3d 1232; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38863; 1996 WL 23176
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/711389

## Opinion text

74 F.3d 1232
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Andre Brown NELSON, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Respondent--Appellee.
No. 95-7034.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 23, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-94-398)
Andre Brown Nelson, Appellant Pro Se.
Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
1
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
PER CURIAM
2
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Nelson v. Murray, No. CA-94-398 (E.D. Va. June 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/711389. Public record. Not legal advice.