# Arlin Murphy v. Jumacris Mining, Incorporated Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · December 26, 1995 · 73 F.3d 358

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/710419

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 26, 1995
- **Citations:** 73 F.3d 358; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40407; 1995 WL 758368
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/710419

## Opinion text

73 F.3d 358
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Arlin MURPHY, Petitioner,
v.
JUMACRIS MINING, INCORPORATED; Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States Department of
Labor, Respondents.
No. 95-2062.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Dec. 26, 1995.
Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Dec. 26, 1995.
Arlin Murphy, Petitioner Pro Se. George Lawson Partain, Logan, West Virginia; Christian P. Barber, Jennifer U. Toth, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Ben.Rev.Bd.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits * pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1995). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Murphy v. Jumacris Coal Co., No. 89-3073-BLA (B.R.B. Apr. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Appellant's claim was for medical benefits only

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/710419. Public record. Not legal advice.