# Hunt v. Gurney

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · December 21, 1995 · 73 F.3d 357

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/710382

## Case

- **Full name:** Roy Sylvester Hunt v. Patrick J. Gurney P.A. Terrangi, Deputy Warden J.E. Clark, Assistant Deputy Warden E.K. Brown, Counselor Larry Turner, Counselor Clarence L. Jackson Francis Kafha Ellis B. Wright, Warden Wayne Brown W.S. Copeland Edward W. Murray, Director Peter G. Decker, Jr.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 21, 1995
- **Citations:** 73 F.3d 357; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40388; 1995 WL 756334
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/710382

## Opinion text

73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Roy Sylvester HUNT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Patrick J. GURNEY; P.A. Terrangi, Deputy Warden; J.E.
Clark, Assistant Deputy Warden; E.K. Brown, Counselor;
Larry Turner, Counselor; Clarence L. Jackson; Francis
Kafha; Ellis B. Wright, Warden; Wayne Brown; W.S.
Copeland; Edward W. Murray, Director; Peter G. Decker,
Jr., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-7046.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 28, 1995.
Decided: December 21, 1995.
Roy Sylvester Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.
Before LUTTIG and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. * We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hunt v. Gurney, No. CA-94-385 (E.D. Va. June 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 636 (c) (West 1993)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/710382. Public record. Not legal advice.