# Alvin Dotson v. Clinchfield Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · December 15, 1995 · 72 F.3d 126

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/709694

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 15, 1995
- **Citations:** 72 F.3d 126; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39532; 1995 WL 747363
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/709694

## Opinion text

72 F.3d 126
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Alvin DOTSON, Petitioner,
v.
CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States Department of
Labor, Respondents.
No. 95-2701.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 7, 1995.
Decided Dec. 15, 1995.
Alvin Dotson, Petitioner Pro Se.
Timothy Ward Gresham, PENN, STUART, ESKRIDGE & JONES, Abingdon, Virginia; Patricia May Nece, Karen Nancy Blank, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (95-1196-BLA)
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1995). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Dotson v. Clinchfield Coal Co., No. 95-1196-BLA (B.R.B. Aug. 25, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/709694. Public record. Not legal advice.