# Edge v. D.C. Board of Paroles

> Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · November 30, 2001 · 22 F. App'x 555

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7088172

## Case

- **Full name:** Vincent EDGE v. D.C. BOARD OF PAROLES Brian Gibson, Warden
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 30, 2001
- **Citations:** 22 F. App'x 555
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7088172

## Opinion text

Pro se District of Columbia prisoner Vincent Edge appeals a district court judgment that dismissed his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The case has been referred to this panel pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. We unanimously agree that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Upon de novo review, Charles v. Chandler, 180 F.3d 753, 755 (6th Cir.1999), we conclude that the district court properly dismissed Edge’s petition for the reasons set forth in its opinion.
Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by that court in its memorandum of opinion and order entered on March 22, 2001. Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7088172. Public record. Not legal advice.