# Brown v. Angelone

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · August 17, 2001 · 16 F. App'x 269

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7079221

## Case

- **Full name:** Demetrious Eric BROWN, a/k/a Denrick Eric Brown, a/k/a Demmerick Eric Brown v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director Gene M. Johnson, Deputy Director Refus Fleming, Regional Director David Garraghty, Chief Warden S.J. Avent, Administrative Assistant Warden J.D. Oaths, Medical Administrator for the Virginia Department of Corrections J. Capps, Human Rights Advocate Charles Allen, Unit Manager B. phillips, Medical Administrator for (CMS) Ella Klug, Regional Administrator for (CMS) Beth Kennedy, Regional Manager for (CMS) Mike Pfeiffer, Medical Operation Manager for (CMS) Annette Holmes, Medical Administrator for (CMS) K. Hamlin, Head Nurse for (CMS) D. Sloan, LPN for (CMS) C. Manning, LPN for (CMS) Roy P. Harris, Prison Guard, Lieutenant Vincent M. Gore, Doctor for (CMS) M. Vernon Smith, Doctor, Health Care Director Doctor Swether Doctor Salih
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 17, 2001
- **Citations:** 16 F. App'x 269
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7079221

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
Demetrious Eric Brown appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) action alleging indifference to serious medical need. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7079221. Public record. Not legal advice.