# State v. Thomas

> Indiana Court of Appeals · May 18, 2005 · 827 N.E.2d 577

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7076044

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE of Indiana, Appellant-Plaintiff v. Nicholas THOMAS, Appellee-Defendant
- **Court:** Indiana Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** May 18, 2005
- **Citations:** 827 N.E.2d 577; 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 827; 2005 WL 1163267
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Baker
- **Judges:** Baker, Friedlander, Sharpnack
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7076044

## Opinion text

BAKER, Judge,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
While I concur with the majority’s opinion inasmuch as it has determined that this issue is not moot, I must dissent from the resolution of the remaining issue. Thomas clearly concedes in his brief that the trial court erred. “The Appellee accepts the States [sic] contentions and arguments as being legally and factually correct.” Ap-pellee’s Br. p. 5. The only issue that Thomas argued was mootness. Thus, our inquiry should have ended with the resolution of that question in the State’s favor. I therefore vote to reverse the decision of the trial court.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7076044. Public record. Not legal advice.