# Bryfogle v. Arizona Board of Regents

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · June 21, 2001 · 13 F. App'x 538

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7075063

## Case

- **Full name:** R. Charles BRYFOGLE v. ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, a body corporate 2020 N. Central Ave, Phx AZ and its subdivision University of Arizona and Department Steward Observatory
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 21, 2001
- **Citations:** 13 F. App'x 538
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Gould, Scannlain, Silverman
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7075063

## Opinion text

MEMORANDUM **
R. Charles Bryfogle appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 action, which alleged that decisions of a state court deprived him of various constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for abuse of discretion the district court’s decision to abstain under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 87 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971), see Martinez v. Newport Beach City, 125 F.3d 777, 780 (9th Cir.1997), and we review de novo a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, see Hexom v. Oregon Dep’t of Transp., 171 F.3d 1134, 1135 (9th Cir.1999). We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed October 3, 2000.
We deny Bryfogle’s motion to lift the stay filed May 3, 2001 as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7075063. Public record. Not legal advice.